01 / Engineering perspective

Define the unit of value

The correct question may be whether a reviewer completes a case faster, whether citations support a decision, or whether an agent chooses the right tool—not whether a response resembles a reference sentence.

02 / Engineering perspective

Test realistic inputs

Include incomplete records, conflicting documents, unusual terminology, unavailable systems, and ambiguous requests. Production reliability is defined by difficult cases, not polished demonstrations.

03 / Engineering perspective

Measure abstention

A system should know when evidence is weak or an action exceeds its authority. Useful evaluation includes escalation quality, reviewer effort, and safe failure behavior.

04 / Engineering perspective

Keep evaluation alive

Datasets, prompts, models, tools, and business rules change. Evaluation should run continuously against versioned scenarios with visible acceptance thresholds.

Bring the decision into focus

Apply this thinking to a real system.

We can map the operating constraint, evidence requirement, and safest path to a representative proof.

Discuss a project ↗